%====================================================================
% File survey.tex
% Last revised July 17, 1996.
% INSTRUCTIONS:
% Insert the requested information inside the {} brackets as follows:
% \name{}      your name.
% \address{}   your address - use \\ to generate line breaks (3 lines max.)
% \position{}  your position (Professor, PDF, Research Associate, etc).
% \tel{}       your telephone number.
% \fax{}       your fax number.
% \email{}     your e-mail address.
% \tick{}      replace with \tick{x} to indicate your choice from a list.
% \num{}       the requested number, as appropriate.
% \dollars{}   the requested dollar amount (omit the $ sign).
% \answer{}    your answer to a question.
% \is{}        your short (one line) answer to a question.
% 
% EXAMPLE:
% \name{Gordon Drake}
% \address{Department of Physics\\University of Windsor\\
% Windsor, ON N9B 3P4}
% \position{Professor}
% \tel{(519) 253-4232 ext.\ 2656}
% \fax{(519) 973-7075}
% \email{A36@server.uwindsor.ca}
% 
% NOTE:
% If you change \answer{} to \answer{ }, or insert any text, the space
% between questions automatically adjusts to yield the space required.
% However, very long answers may exceed the buffer size on some older versions
% of LaTeX.  If this happens, change the \vskip command to \vskip 5pt,
% and delete the \answer{} command.
% 
% The questionnaire begins following the macro definitions and covering letter.
%
\documentstyle[12pt]{article}
%
\oddsidemargin 0pc
\evensidemargin 0pc
\topmargin -3pc
\headheight 12pt
\headsep 10pt
\topskip 10pt
\textheight 9in
\textwidth 6.5in
\parindent 2pc
%
\settowidth{\labelwidth}{9.}
\leftmargini\labelwidth
\advance\leftmargini by \labelsep
\leftmargin\leftmargini
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% MACRO DEFINITIONS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\catcode`@=11
\def\uline{ \leaders\hrule height -2pt depth 2.5pt\hfill\ }
\def\short{\hbox to 0.5in{\uline}}
\def\name#1{\gdef\@name{#1}}
\def\position#1{\gdef\@position{#1}}
\def\address#1{\gdef\@address{#1}}
\def\tel#1{\gdef\@tel{#1}}
\def\fax#1{\gdef\@fax{#1}}
\def\email#1{\gdef\@email{#1}}
\def\tick#1{\leavevmode\hbox to 8pt{$\Box$\kern-8.1pt{\sf 
    \uppercase{#1}}\hss}\ }
\def\num#1{\unskip\hbox to 0.5in{\short\hskip-0.5in\hbox to %
    0.5in{\hfill#1\hfill}\hss}\qquad}
\def\dollars#1{\unskip\hbox{\hskip0.2in\hbox to .9in{\uline}\kern-.95in
    \hbox to .95in{\$\,#1\hfil}}}
\newlength{\saveskip}
\def\answer#1{\saveskip\lastskip\vskip-\lastskip\setbox0=\hbox{#1}
   \ifdim\wd0>1pt\vskip5pt#1\else\vrule height\saveskip width 0pt
   \vskip 10pt plus0pt minus10pt\fi}
\def\is#1{\unskip\hbox to 4in{\uline}\kern-3.9in #1\hfill}
%
\def\@name{}\def\@address{}\def\@position{}\def\@tel{}\def\@fax{}\def\@email{}
\def\maketitle{\par\bgroup\parindent0pc
  \def\subline##1{\rlap{\hskip 10pt\lower 11pt\hbox{\footnotesize ##1}}\uline}
  \def\headerline##1##2{\hbox to 3.5in{\subline{##1}}\hskip .2in
    \hbox to 2.8in{\subline{##2}}}
\begin{center}\@title\end{center}\advance\baselineskip by 0.75\baselineskip
%
% \box0 contains the blank form for name, address, etc. with the lines
% labeled as indicated in \headerline{}{}.
\setbox0=\vtop{\noindent%
\headerline{Name}{Position}\\
\headerline{Address}{Telephone}\\
\headerline{}{Fax}\\
\headerline{}{e-mail}}
%
% \box1 and \box2 contain the information filled in by the respondent.
\setbox1=\vtop{\hsize=3.5in\relax\@name\par\@address}
\setbox2=\vtop{\hsize=2.8in\relax\@position\par\@tel\par\@fax\par\@email}
%
% now print it all out at the top of the questionnaire.
\begin{tabbing}\rule{5pt}{0pt}\=\rule{3.7in}{0pt}\=\kill
\box0\>\box1\>\box2\end{tabbing}\vskip10pt\egroup}
\catcode`@=12
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% END OF MACRO DEFINITIONS %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%
\begin{document}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN COVERING LETTER - GENERAL VERSION %%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\thispagestyle{empty}
\mbox{\hss}\vskip 1.5in\par
{\hfill July 22, 1996.}\\[10pt]
\noindent
Dear Colleague:\vskip 10pt

We need your help.  As you know, most of the Physics allocations from NSERC
suffered in the 1994 grant re-allocation exercise, and the next round
is scheduled for 1998.  Based on a detailed proposal by CAP, NSERC 
has provided funds for a thorough independent review of physics 
research  in Canada.  The reports resulting from this review will provide 
input to the preparation of the various GSC submissions to the 1998 NSERC 
Re-allocation Committee.  Each GSC has the right to prepare its own 
submission.  It goes without saying that it is very important to prepare 
the best possible submissions.

The Main Committee charged with the task of undertaking a review
of physics research in Canada has been divided into the following
subcommittees:
\begin{tabbing}
mm\=\kill
1. \>Condensed Matter\\
2. \>General/Atmospheric/Space Physics and General Relativity\\
3. \>Subatomic Physics\\
4. \>Highly Qualified Personnel/Economic Aspects
\end{tabbing}

This letter and questionnaire is addressed to researchers in the
above three subfields of physics.
The membership and chairs of each subcommittee are listed at 
the end of the questionnaire.  Note that this division into subcommittees 
is only for purposes of undertaking a survey of physics as broadly 
defined, and it does not imply a similar grouping for 
purposes of preparing final submissions to the NSERC Re-allocation 
Committee.  The intent is for each GSC to prepare its own final submission,
using the results of this survey as input.

Please give some time and thought to the enclosed questionnaire.  Your 
answers will form an important part of the review process, and all 
members of the research community are expected to reply.  Although many
of the questions are directed to NSERC grant holders, responses from
other faculty, postdoctoral fellows and research associates are also
encouraged.
The questionnaire is divided into the following sections:
\begin{tabbing}
mmm\=\kill
I.  \> Personal Statistical Information\\
II. \> Personal Research Contributions\\
III \> Canadian Strengths and Weaknesses in Physics Research\\
IV. \> Selectivity and the Use of Available Funding\\
V.  \> Vision for the Future\\
VI. \> Physics Students and Graduates\\
VII.\> Other Comments and Recommendations
\end{tabbing}
Please answer all of Sections I and II, fill out the table on physics
graduates in Section VI, and complete those parts of the rest as applicable
for which you have comments to make.  Use additional sheets of paper if 
there is not sufficient space on the form.  Alternatively, replies can 
be entered directly into the \LaTeX\ file for the questionnaire.  It can 
be obtained by downloading it by anonymous ftp from 
cepheid.physics.utoronto.ca (see pub/physics), 
or http://cepheid.physics.utoronto.ca/Review.

INITIAL REPLIES ARE REQUESTED BY AUGUST 16, 1996.
Current grant holders who do not reply by then will be contacted
by a member of the Review Committee.  For this reason, and for
purposes of obtaining follow-up information, respondents are asked
to identify themselves.  However, replies will be held in confidence,
and only reported in a way that does not reveal the identities of
individuals to NSERC or others.  Respondents who do not wish to have
their name on the form may leave this part blank, and supply the
requested contact information on a separate sheet of paper.

     While NSERC is providing valuable logistical and financial 
     assistance in conducting the review, it does not wish to 
     influence the outcome, nor does it necessarily endorse it. 
     Similarly, while CAP was directly involved in setting up the 
     process and selecting the Canadian subcommittee members, it has 
     no control of the process beyond that stage. Direct CAP 
     participation will be limited to a subcommittee collecting data 
     on the training of highly qualified personnel, chaired by Bev 
     Robertson, the current President of CAP. Thus CAP also does not 
     necessarily endorse the outcome of the research review process.
     
Finally, if you are not already a member of the Canadian Association of
Physicists (CAP), then {\bf please join} (phone 613-562-5614, fax 
613-562-5615).  It is becoming increasingly clear that research in
physics, and in science generally, will only thrive in the present 
climate if we have strong and united representation at the political
level.  Paul Vincett, past president of CAP, has done a phenomenal job
over the past year in lobbying the federal government on crucial funding
issues, such as adequate funding to NSERC and the growing crisis in
infrastructure support, but we need your backing as a member of CAP to
strengthen these efforts.

Replies should be sent to the appropriate committee chair, as listed 
at the end of the questionnaire.  Many thanks for your co-operation.
%
\vskip\baselineskip\noindent
Yours sincerely,\vskip 12pt
%
\begin{tabbing}
\rule{1.7in}{0pt}\=\rule{2.5in}{0pt}\=\kill
Michael Thewalt,  \>Gordon W. F. Drake,  \>Faqir Khanna and Pekka Sinervo\\
Chair,            \>Chair,               \>Chair and Vice Chair,\\
Condensed Matter\>General/Atmospheric/Space\>Subatomic Physics Committee.\\
Committee        \>Physics and General Relativity\\
                 \>Committee
\end{tabbing}
\vskip\baselineskip\noindent
%
P.S.  This version of the covering letter is for purposes of general
distribution only, and it does not replace the one sent directly by mail
from NSERC to NSERC grantholders.  If you received a direct mailing,
please refer to it for additional information.  The questionnaire is
otherwise identical.
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% END OF COVERING LETTER - GENERAL VERSION %%%%%%%%%%
\newpage
\count0=1
%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN QUESTIONNAIRE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\title{SURVEY OF PHYSICS AND SPACE SCIENCE RESEARCH IN CANADA}
\name{}
\address{}
\position{}
\tel{}
\fax{}
\email{}

\maketitle

\noindent{\bf I.  PERSONAL STATISTICAL INFORMATION}
\begin{enumerate}
\item
Please identify yourself as one of the following:\\[5pt]\noindent
\tick{} NSERC funded faculty        \qquad
\tick{} non-NSERC funded faculty    \qquad
\tick{} RA                          \qquad
\tick{} PDF                         \\
\tick{} other \is{}
\item
Please identify below ONE of the three major areas which best encompasses
your research, together with as many subtopics within that group as are
applicable.\vskip 5pt
%
\tick{} CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS
\vspace{-8pt}
\begin{tabbing}\rule{16pt}{0pt}\=\rule{230pt}{0pt}\=\kill
%
\>\tick{} materials science       \> \tick{} neutron scattering  \\
\>\tick{} surface science         \> \tick{} x-ray and synchrotron\\
\>\tick{} biophysics              \> \tick{} materials growth    \\
\>\tick{} soft materials          \> \tick{} materials modification\\
\>\tick{} pattern formation       \> \tick{} materials characterization\\
\>\tick{} magnetic properties     \> \tick{} computational materials science\\
\>\tick{} electronic properties   \> \tick{} superconductivity (normal) \\
\>\tick{} phase transitions       \> \tick{} superconductivity (high $T_c$)\\
\>\tick{} semiconductors          \> \tick{} mesoscopic properties\\
\>\tick{} photonic materials      \> \tick{} highly correlated electron systems
\\[5pt]
\>\tick{} other \is{}%
\end{tabbing}
%
\tick{} GENERAL/ATMOSPHERIC/SPACE PHYSICS AND GENERAL RELATIVITY
\vspace{-8pt}
\begin{tabbing}\rule{16pt}{0pt}\=\rule{230pt}{0pt}\=\kill
%
\>\tick{} spectroscopy, atomic and molecular  \> \tick{} photonics           \\
\>\tick{} collisions, atomic and molecular    \> \tick{} materials science   \\
\>\tick{} other atomic \& molecular properties\> \tick{} atmospheric physics \\
\>\tick{} optical physics                     \> \tick{} space science       \\
\>\tick{} laser physics                       \> \tick{} astrophysics        \\
\>\tick{} plasma physics                      \> \tick{} general relativity  \\
\>\tick{} controlled fusion             \> \tick{} fundamental physics and QED\\
\>\tick{} surface interactions          \> \tick{} subatomic physics\\[5pt]
\>\tick{} other \is{}%
\end{tabbing}
%
\tick{} SUBATOMIC PHYSICS
\item
  Is your research primarily experimental or theoretical?\\[5pt]
  \tick{} experimental  \qquad   \tick{} theoretical 
\item
  What is the current size of your NSERC research grant? \dollars{}/annum.
\item
  If you receive other forms of NSERC support (excluding equipment grants), please complete the following:
\begin{enumerate}
   \item
   Type of grant \is{}
   \item
   Project title \is{}
   \item
   Principal investigator \is{}
   \item
   Number of participants \num{}
   \item
   Annual budget \dollars{}
\end{enumerate}
\item
  Please list any other sources of research funding and the amounts.\\[5pt]
%   (duplicate the lines below if additional lines are needed.)
Canadian:\\[5pt]
source \is{} \dollars{}/annum\\[5pt]
source \is{} \dollars{}/annum\\[5pt]
%
Foreign:\\[5pt]
source \is{} \dollars{}/annum\\[5pt]
source \is{} \dollars{}/annum
%
\item
Please provide information on the following statistical indicators of impact.
\begin{enumerate}
  \item
    Number of refereed journal publications:\\[10pt]
%
    Total \num{}    Last five years \num{}
%
  \item
    Total number of citations for your top five papers for each of the last 
    five years:\\[10pt]
%
1995 \num{}   1994 \num{}   1993 \num{}   1992 \num{}   1991 \num{}  \\[10pt]
%
    \qquad (note that the Citations Index is by first author only).
  \item
    Number of invited conference papers in the last five years:
  \begin{enumerate}
    \item
     Canadian conference \num{}
    \item
     International conference \num{}
    \end{enumerate}
%
  \item
    Number of review articles in the last five years \num{}
%
  \item
    Honours and awards:\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  Other forms of recognition:\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}

\noindent{\bf II.  PERSONAL RESEARCH CONTRIBUTIONS}
\begin{enumerate}
\item
  Briefly describe your research in nontechnical terms.\vskip 1.5in
\answer{}
\item
  What opportunities do you see for the future development of
  your research?\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Why are these developments important to the advancement of
  the field?\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Describe the impact that your work has had on, for example,
  (a) your particular field of specialization, (b) physics in general,
  (c) science in general, and/or (d) technological applications.\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Describe the anticipated impact that proposed future work could 
  have on, for example, (a) your particular field of specialization,
  (b) physics in general, (c) science in general, and/or (d) technological
  applications.\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Describe the impact that you foresee for your subfield on the development
  of physics in general and/or technological applications.\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Are you involved in collaborative projects?\quad
  \tick{} YES  \qquad  \tick{} NO\\[5pt]
  If you answered YES, please answer the following questions:
\begin{enumerate}
  \item
   Describe the nature of university-based collaborations,
   including those with other disciplines.\vskip 1in
  \answer{}
  \item
   Describe the nature of collaborations with industry etc.\vskip 1in
  \answer{}
  \item
   Describe the nature of other collaborations (e.g. with NRC)\vskip 1in
  \answer{}
\end{enumerate}
\item
   What additional initiatives and progress could you make if your
   NSERC operating grant were doubled?  Include examples of 
   opportunities lost due to underfunding.\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  What would be the adverse effects if your NSERC operating grant were
  halved?  Consider here questions of urgency and priorities.\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  What is the role and importance of university infrastructure (e.g. 
  machine shops, technical support) to your research?\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  Do large central facilities such as synchrotrons play an important role in
  your research?  If so, please outline
\begin{enumerate}
  \item
    the facilities used\vskip 0.5in
  \answer{}
  \item
    problems or difficulties\vskip 0.5in
  \answer{}
  \item
    desirable improvements or enhancements\vskip 0.5in
  \answer{}
\end{enumerate}
\item
  Could your research benefit from large scale computing facilities?
  If so, please outline.\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  Are there other areas of research that you draw upon in your work?  If
  so, please describe.\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\end{enumerate}

\noindent
\hbox to \textwidth{\bf III.  CANADIAN STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES IN PHYSICS RESEARCH\hss}
\begin{enumerate}
\item
  What do you believe are the current areas of strength in Canada
  for physics research, rated on an international scale?  Please 
  elaborate.\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  What do you believe are the current areas of weakness in Canada
  for physics research, rated on an international scale?  Please 
  elaborate.\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  Weaknesses might include important new or emerging areas.  Should
  these be strengthened?  If so, at the expense of what?\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  In view of the above, should there be particular areas of focus for 
  Canada in the future, and if so, which?\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  What steps should be taken by NSERC or the research community to 
  ensure that a defined area of focus does not unduly diminish research
  diversity and risk-taking?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  Describe any anecdotal ``success stories" you might know involving
  industrial or interdisciplinary applications of Canadian physics in
  either your own area of research, or in other areas.\vskip 1.5in
\answer{}
\end{enumerate}

\noindent{\bf IV.  SELECTIVITY AND THE USE OF AVAILABLE FUNDING}\par

In order to accomplish best the objectives for physics research in Canada
within the available funding, the Grant Selection Committees (GSCs) must
decide how selective to be in awarding grants.  Should the most productive
researchers be supported at an internationally competitive level?  If so,
at whose expense?  Are there other special concerns to be taken into
account?
\begin{enumerate}
\item
  With these considerations in mind, do you think that the Physics GSC's 
  should be\\
  \tick{} more selective\\
  \tick{} about the same\\
  \tick{} less selective\\
  \tick{} other, see rationale below\par

  \noindent Outline the rationale for your recommendation.\vskip 0.75in
\answer{}
\item
  Are there special considerations that should be taken into account
  regarding
\begin{enumerate}
\item
  regional and geographical distribution?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  support of researchers in smaller universities?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  risk-taking and diversity of research?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\end{enumerate}
\item
  Do you believe in the concept of a minimum useful grant, and if so what
  level(s) would be appropriate?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  Do you believe that there should be some maximum level(s) for the funding
  of an individual in the research grants program, and if so what should
  it(they) be?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  Do you have any comments on the present situation regarding startup grants
  for new researchers?  If you propose increased funding, where should it
  come from?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  Do you have any comments on the NSERC equipment and major equipment
  funding programs?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  Given the growing emphasis on research partnerships, particularly with
  industry, should those in less industrially developed parts of Canada
  be helped in their participation?  If so, can you suggest
  mechanisms?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  What strategies should NSERC adopt regarding:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
  risk-taking (i.e.\ the support of speculative proposals with
  with limited chances of success, but large potential pay-offs)\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  encouragement of spin-off activities and ventures\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  better communication of research results to other disciplines and
  to the public\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  greater participation of physicists in interdisciplinary 
  research\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\end{enumerate}
\item
 How can the impact of Canadian physics research on other disciplines
    be enhanced?\vskip 0.5in
\answer{}
\item
  Could the overall health of Canadian physics (or a particular
  subdiscipline) be enhanced by a major collaborative effort across
  physics boundaries and/or across other disciplines?  If so, 
  please elaborate.\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\end{enumerate}

\noindent{\bf V.  VISION FOR THE FUTURE}\par

The areas of research covered by the various Physics GSC's are diverse.
Nevertheless, one of the strengths of physics lies in its search for
the principles underlying diverse phenomena, and the unification of
understanding.  Physicists have a long history of recognizing the importance
of new phenomena and developing new applications.  Within this context,
please consider the following questions:
\begin{enumerate}
\item
  What exciting themes do you see emerging (or already exist) in your own
  area of research, and its relationship to others?\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  What themes should be encouraged in the broader context of
  physics research in Canada?  Are there particular areas of research
  that should be emphasized?\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Do you see opportunities for new or continuing interdisciplinary
  research?\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\item
  What should be the attitude of our community to the role of applied
  research?\vskip 1in
\answer{}
\end{enumerate}

\noindent{\bf VI.  PHYSICS STUDENTS AND GRADUATES}
\begin{enumerate}
\item
  How many students have graduated from your research group in
  the last five years?\\[10pt]
  M.Sc.\ number\num{}  \qquad\qquad      Ph.D. number\num{}
\item
  How many of these are currently employed as physicists, or in closely
  related disciplines?
\begin{tabbing}\rule{129pt}{0pt}\=\rule{101pt}{0pt}\=\rule{130pt}{0pt}\=\kill
%
  M.Sc.\ number in Canada\>\num{}\>  Ph.D. number in Canada\>\num{}\\[10pt]
  M.Sc.\ number elsewhere\>\num{}\>  Ph.D. number elsewhere\>\num{}
%
\end{tabbing}
\item
  Can you cite examples of graduate students carrying technological
  skills or innovations from their research into industry?\vskip 1.75in
\answer{}
\item
  How might technological transfer by students from universities to 
  industry be improved?\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Do you feel that student training and/or employment prospects can be
  enhanced by direct contact with industrial research or collaboration with
  industry?  Has this played any part in your research program?\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Does physics research play a role in your undergraduate program (e.g. 
  honours thesis projects), or do you hire undergraduate students as 
  research assistants?  If so, please elaborate.\vskip 1.25in
\answer{}
\item
  Do you think that your involvement in research makes your teaching\\[5pt]
  \tick{} much better     \qquad 
  \tick{} better          \qquad
  \tick{} the same        \qquad
  \tick{} worse           \qquad
  \tick{} much worse.
\item
  What do you perceive are the unique benefits that a student should
  obtain from a physics education (especially undergraduate)?\vskip 1.5in
\answer{}
\item
  Please fill in the following table with the names of your M.Sc.\ or Ph.D.
  students who have graduated over the past six years (July 1990 to July 1996),
  and also postdoctoral fellows (PDF) or research associates (RA) who left
  your group during this period.  Include their current occupation, or
  indicate their position if currently a PDF, RA, or technician (T).
\end{enumerate}
\par\noindent\hskip-0.5in\setbox0=\hbox to 6.5in{%
{\renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5}
\begin{tabular}{|p{1.8in}|l|l|p{1in}|p{3in}|}
\hline
\hline
                    &Position&    &Current    &                        \\[-10pt]
                    &  or    &    &Occupation &                        \\[-10pt]
Name                & Degree &Year&or Position&Employer/Location              \\
\hline
% INSTRUCTIONS:  Begin inserting information below between the & signs
% according to the above headings.  Note that the last two columns for 
% for Current Occupation and Employer/location will automatically expand 
% to allow extra lines if needed.  Do not use \\ for line breaks - just
% keep typing.  A sample line might be:
% 
% Maxwell Smart       & Ph.D.&1994&espionage  &CIA, Washington, D.C.        \\
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
                      &      &    &           &                             \\
\hline
\hline
\end{tabular}}\hss}
\box0
\vskip 2in
\noindent{\bf VII.  OTHER COMMENTS OR RECOMMENDATIONS}
\vskip 4in
\answer{}

\par\noindent
\begin{tabbing}
\rule{150pt}{0pt}\=\rule{150pt}{0pt}\=\rule{45pt}{0pt}\=\kill                                           
Depending on the major area of research selected in Question I.2, 
please return to one of:\\[5pt]
%{\sc condensed matter physics}\\
{\sc condensed matter}\> Prof. Michael Thewalt\>   e-mail:\> Thewalt@sfu.ca\\
{\sc physics}\> Department of Physics\>   Fax:   \> (604) 291-3592\\
\> Simon Fraser University\> Tel:   \> (604) 291-3384\\
\> Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6\\[8pt]
%
%{\sc general/atmospheric/space physics and general relativity}\\
{\sc general/atmos./}\> Prof. Gordon Drake\>      e-mail:\> A36@server.uwindsor.ca\\
{\sc space physics and}\> Department of Physics\>   Fax:   \> (519) 973-7075\\
{\sc general relativity}\> University of Windsor\>   Tel:   \> (519) 253-4232 Ext. 2656.\\
\> Windsor, ON N9B 3P4\\[8pt]
%
%{\sc subatomic physics}\\
{\sc subatomic}\> Prof. Pekka K. Sinervo\>  e-mail:\> pekka@physics.utoronto.ca\\
{\sc physics}\> Department of Physics\>   Fax:   \> (416) 978-8221\\
\> University of Toronto\>   Tel:   \> (416) 978-5270\\
\> Toronto, ON M5S 1A7
\end{tabbing}
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% END OF QUESTIONNAIRE %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\clearpage
{\footnotesize
\noindent{\bf Main Committee}\\[10pt]
\quad Bill Halperin (Northwestern Univ.) Chair\quad Halperin@casbah.acns.nwu.edu.\\[10pt]
\noindent{\bf Condensed Matter}\\[10pt]
\begin{tabular}{lll}
Mike Thewalt (SFU)&   Chair&     Thewalt@sfu.ca\\
John Berlinsky (McMaster)&   High $T_c$ superconductors, theoretical 
 &  Berlinsk@mcmail.CIS\\
            &aspects of electronic states/magnetism&.mcmaster.ca\\
Martin Grant (McGill)&   Soft condensed matter, statistical& 
     Grant@physics.mcgill.ca\\
        &mechanics, polymers\\
Thom Mason (U. of Toronto)& Neutron/synchrotron scattering, 
 experi-&   
 Mason@physics.utoronto.ca\\
             &mental aspects of magnetism, heavy \\
             &fermion systems\\
Sjoerd Roorda (U. Montreal)& Surface and applied physics, &  Roorda@LPS.umontreal.ca\\
     &ions beams for CM research\\
Jeff Young (UBC)& Semiconductors, heterostructures, 
 & Young@physics.ubc.ca\\
     &nanostructures, mesoscopic systems
\end{tabular}\\[10pt]
%
\noindent{\bf General/Space/Atmospheric Physics/General Relativity}\\[10pt]
\begin{tabular}{lll}
Gordon Drake (Windsor) &Chair    &A36@server.uwindsor.ca\\
	Paul Corkum (NRC)&  Laser physics/spectroscopy/optics&     Paul.Corkum@nrc.ca\\
Bill McConkey (Windsor)& Atomic and molecular scattering   &
 Mcconk@server.uwindsor.ca\\
Henri Pepin (INRS) &Plasma physics&    Pepin@inrs-ener.uquebec.ca\\
Bill Unruh (UBC) &General Relativity&  Unruh@physics.ubc.ca\\
Henry van Driel (U Toronto)&  General physics applications&   
 Vandriel@physics.utoronto.ca\\
Ted Llewellyn (U. Sask) &Atmospheric and Space&   Llewellyn@skisas.usask.ca\\
\end{tabular}\\[10pt]
%
\noindent{\bf SubAtomic Physics}\\[10pt]
\begin{tabular}{lll}
Faqir Khanna (Alberta)& Chair&       Khanna@phys.ualberta.ca\\
Pekka Sinervo (Toronto)& Particle physics, and co-chair&     
Pekka@physics.utoronto.ca\\
Jean-Michel Poutissou (TRIUMF)& Medium/high energy physics& JMP@triumf.ca\\
Richard Keeler (Victoria)& Particle physics&   RKeeler@uvic.ca\\
Jean Barrette (McGill)& Heavy Ions&     Barrette@physics.mcgill.ca\\
Aksel Hallin (Queens)&  SNO&   Hallin@mips2.phy.queensu.ca
\end{tabular}\\[10pt]
%
\noindent{\bf HQP / Economic Aspects (CAP Committee)}\\[10pt]
\begin{tabular}{ll}
Bev Robertson (Regina), Chair&  Robertsb@leroy.cc.uregina.ca\\
Paul Vincett (FairCopy)&    Paul\_Vincett@torho.xc.xerox.ca\\
Ted Dixon (U Waterloo, and Waterloo Scientific)& AEDixon@uwaterloo.ca\\
Gordon Rostoker (Alberta)&  Rostoker@space.ualberta.ca\\
John de la Mothe (U. Ottawa)&\\
George Beer (U. Victoria)&     Beer@uvphs.uvic.ca
\end{tabular}}
\end{document}
% end of survey.tex

